Thoughtful reviews, the Boulder film scene

" The Oriental doesn’t put the same high price on life as the Westerner. Life is plentiful. Life is cheap in the Orient. And as the philosophy of the orient expresses it, life is not important. "
— General William Westmoreland, Hearts and Minds

MRQE Top Critic


Walks you out of an emotional underworld back into the light —Marty Mapes (review...)

Cox lives three times in November

Sponsored links

Having just read a trilogy of rich, detailed science fiction novels about the colonization of Mars, I went to Red Planet with some trepidation. Could they have possibly handled the idea of a human trip to Mars as well as did Kim Stanley Robinson (author of the Red Mars trilogy)? No.

In fact, I lowered my expectations for Red Planet, knowing that it wouldn’t be a very good science fiction film. What I had hoped for, however, was that it would make a good horror film, like Pitch Black. The previews emphasized the threat of a robotic dog gone haywire, so it was a distinct possibility. But alas, Red Planet is a forgettable disappointment. The robotic dog is a minor conflict, seemingly added to spice up this film that takes place on Mars, for goshsakes! You’d think the first journey to another planet might, in itself, inspire a sense of interest or awe, but it doesn’t, not in this film.

The only fun in Red Planet is trying to spot the reflections of the camera and crew in the smoothly-polished faceplates of the astronauts.

(Note to Richard: the science in Red Planet is done badly — for example, the characters call attention to the “light gravity” as they urinate, then they walk off in a perfect earth-gravity gait. Then there’s the “low pressure” Martian storm system that measures 870 millibars — low for earth, but unattainably high on a planet with 1/3 the gravity. Finally, Mars is presented as being hot, one of those misconceptions probably based on association of the color red with heat. Oh well.)