An Inconvenient Truth is scary stuff; it paints a gloomy future ravaged by global warming. But it also prescribes solutions, many of which are within the power of every individual.
As for the movie’s messenger, Al Gore, it’s compelling to see this man on a mission.
PG for mild thematic elements
2006 Oscar Nominees
- United 93
- Superman Returns
- The Devil Wears Prada
- Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
- Monster House
- The Departed
- Flags of Our Fathers
- The Prestige
- Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
- Pan's Labyrinth
- Blood Diamond
- Notes on a Scandal
- Letters from Iwo Jima
- Oscar Nominees for 2006: Oscar noms generate yawns
By and large, An Inconvenient Truth is Gore’s global warming “slide show” put to film. It’s a class he’s taught hundreds of times now so, unlike the stiff, poll-directed automaton of presidential elections past, here Gore speaks with confidence and energy.
As Gore readily admits, losing the election was a catalyst to start up his slide show again and resume the pursuit of his core passion. He’ll even be conducting seminars this fall for others to learn the presentation, personalize it, then lead their own classes, thereby spreading the word through grass roots activity.
The material presented is worth listening to, regardless of the side of the political fence upon which one tends to fall. Some of the topics even get the blood boiling, seeing the games people play, the lobbying, the lack of future consideration, the interest in protecting the status quo.
According to Gore’s presentation, the people of the United States do more damage to the environment than the Chinese. Making matters worse, our automakers don’t even meet the Chinese environmental guidelines, so we can’t sell our American cars in the P.R.C.
But the dangers are even more monumental than the U.S. auto industry. Other potential dangers include the complete disappearance of snow at Mt. Kilimanjaro within the next decade and the melting of polar ice caps that could send areas like San Francisco Bay, Manhattan, The Netherlands, Florida, and Calcutta under water.
Is An Inconvenient Truth merely another “docuganda” assault like Fahrenheit 9/11? Well, its vitriol, such as it is, is not directed at a single individual but toward an entire careless way of life that doesn’t consider its impact on the future.
Third-party corroboration would have helped tremendously here. The movie does take pains to humanize Gore through off-topic “on the ranch” footage of him at home and on the road. But it’s really his cause that needs the humanizing. While this is clearly a non-partisan issue, a few on-camera interviews with top scientists to further validate and give a face to the data miners and their theories would’ve given the film that much more credence and gravitas to help fend off the inevitable left wing/right wing debates.
On the “humanizing” front, some of the most effective footage ties the effects of global warming with current events, including the genocide in Darfur. The Darfur region’s Lake Chad has dried to almost nothing, making its water a much more elusive resource and dramatically ratcheting up the desperation in an already difficult land.
As Gore puts it, recent weather activity has been like a hike through the Book of Revelations. Cases of infectious diseases are on the rise with avian flu, West Nile virus, and the like making daily headlines.
Plus there were those devastating heat waves in Europe and India during 2003-2004 and, as a corollary result of global warming relocating precipitation, the rapid rise in hurricanes and typhoons around the globe. Most infamous, of course, was Hurricane Katrina in the southern U.S. last year.
Smartly breaking things down to easily understood concepts, Gore sums it all up by stating that old habits and old technology lead to predictable consequences, many of which we have already witnessed and some (such as CFCs) we have been able to rein in.
But, to more effectively alter the inevitable consequences of staying the current course, we need to use new technologies that are in various stages of development and efficiency.
Gore encapsulates the current economic/environmental debate with a quote from Upton Sinclair, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
Therein is the greatest challenge for those warning of global warming. Money still talks and there’s nothing like the comfort found in immediate gratification. Nonetheless, simple, painless lifestyle changes can lead to an individual gaining greater efficiency from electricity. Plus new technologies in automobiles can provide far greater vehicle efficiency based on renewable resources than the standard, money-grubbing staples of the oil and gas industries.
In time, Gore asserts, the inhabitants of planet Earth can bring CO2 levels back to what they were in the early 1970s – and eventually bring them down to zero.
We already have everything we need to make the change – except for the will to do it. Following the old adage, where there’s a will, there’s a way.
Why should this challenge be any different from others Americans have tackled? Slavery, suffrage, World War II, desegregation, Polio, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the moon landing, were all settled with a lot of blood, sweat, and tears.
The biggest part in solving the global warming crisis is actually simpler. In this case, a little education will go a long way and Gore’s movie fills that need nicely.
The Matt Wing
Are these just the left-wing ramblings of a madman jilted out of the Oval Office? Well, Gore’s passion and humanity are clearly on display in this movie. He’s no longer the stiff man without a sense of humor (who also stakes claim to creating the Internet).
His pleasant, conversational style is enough to make one question the entire electoral process and media coverage that breaks a candidate down to a pollster’s pawn and a 10-second sound bite.
Then again, when the right wing retaliates and they pull out the ol’ “those policies are bad for business” argument, both sides go back to playing the same old tune. If our regulations are so poor that American automotive manufacturers can’t even compete in China because American cars aren’t up to snuff, then perhaps American manufacturers need to bite the bullet now in order to reap long-term benefits. An obvious hide to take it out of would be all those over-priced CEOs who dish out more stress than they personally endure.
It’s clear the U.S. needs to get back to the “I” word. Innovation. That’s what built this country into what it is today, that’s what turned so many of those corporations into the successes that they are (or were) and gave them the “credibility” to line politicians’ pockets with seed money.
To rigidly protect the status quo is a catastrophe in the making when technology and the world are rapidly changing at an ever-increasing pace.
In actuality, both sides of the political aisle need to be reined in from their varying extremist views, falling in line with the glory that is the “Matt Wing.” Maybe I should run for president and maybe Al could be my running mate. That is, after all, part of Gore’s message: people need to speak up in their community. And, if your congressperson doesn’t respond, then run for congress.
With An Inconvenient Truth following in the footsteps of United 93 and The Da Vinci Code, 2006 is turning out to be a great year for movies seeking to create discussion amongst audiences. Granted, especially with The Da Vinci Code, the quality of the movies isn’t always magnificent, but at least the subject matter is intriguing.
A self-described recovering politician, Gore’s documentary is rekindling rumors of renewed presidential aspirations. Ironically, with Hilary Clinton being a polarizing force, Gore might turn out to be the one who unites rather than divides in 2008.
As Gore says, political will is a renewable resource come election time.